Workington 2010
November 24, 2010
Last weekend was the Workington show, where we exhibited Humber Dock. I was greatly assisted by Brian (Lakeland) Lewis, who set up an ingenious sound system, and David Beale and Steve Griffiths who helped me operate it. Steve also put me up on the Friday and Saturday nights. Beforehand, Steve Paulin had helped in many ways to improve the layout and had lent his excellent Bachman Craven DMU and lots of little people, who crewed all the locos and added life to the quayside.
Although we did not win a prize (the only prize I’ve ever won is for “most unusual layout” – which had been won previously by a Lego train set) we got a lot of interest in Humber Dock and it has been invited to the Rawtenstall show on 29/30 Oct next year (and Scalefour North in 2012). People particularly liked the steam sounds. These were created by Brian using a Loksound v 3.5 chip, interposed between a ZTC controller and the track. This meant that all the locos were fed on 12V DC, and they all sounded the same but the effect was nevertheless very effective, with the brake screech sounds in particular being realistically coordinated with the engines’ movement. The children liked the way the engines whistled when off-stage and then appeared unpredictably from one of the three hidden tracks. Betsy had created a loop of downloaded seagull sounds on my MacBook, which created a realistic ambience – and did not, as I had feared, drive us mad by their repetition!
The only down sides were the disgusting haggis at the local fish and chip shop (my fault for even thinking of buying an English haggis!) and the curious man who said my railway was rubbish because it was too high for children to look at. My arguments: that it was primarily aimed at an adult audence; that people liked looking at an eye level exhibit (think of pictures at art galleries); and that lots of children were enjoying it by standing on the box I had thoughtfully provided; fell on deaf ears. I would never be invited, he said, to any of the many exhibitions he organised. I would love to know who he was and what, if anything, he has achieved!
He seemed to be alone in his views, indeed one man who overheard his rant described him as “rude and ignorant”. Nevertheless I was pretty upset by the incident.
My view is that there is room for a range of different types of layout and display formats. I think Clutton, for instance, which has a deep panoramic landscape, looks superb at table top level but I happen to like building dioramas – three dimensional moving pictures – and they would lose their impact if viewed from above. I do, however feel for the wheelchair bound visitors and for a long time have intended to build a periscope to lend to them. It should be a simple exercise in black foam board with a couple of mirrors. A “must do” before Rawtenstall!

I wouldn’t worry about the rude man. Look at it another way, would you really want to attend a show organised by such an ignoramous?
Ultimately you build the layout and you choose how you think it will be best presented. People are free to like or dislike it, and you can get around the height issue with a box, as you did. Similarly, for anyone wheelchair bound, you or the exhibition organisers need only supply a periscope (as happens at Uckfield) and that issue has also been dealt with.
Did you ask him how high his exhibition layout was? Chances are he hasn’t got one!
Regards,
Simon
By chance I did stumble upon an exhibition run by this ignoramus recently. It was in aid of a local railway preservation society and was possibly the worst show I have ever been to. Mind you, it only cost £2. Most of the exhibits were small roundy-roundy rtr train sets. Just one had some kit built locos – quite nice, albeit 00. I sought out the organiser, as I would have liked to give the railway association some support by offering one of my layouts as an exhibit, only to discover who he was. No I would not want to attend another show run by him.
And his layout? Table top, all rtr, pacific and three coaches endlessly circulating, kit-built buildings. The “highlights” were a a haggis farm and treacle mine. A poster denounced rivet-counters and said that model railways should be “fun”. Well, we have fun running Preston or Bradford North Western to timetable, communicating only by block bells and signals.
I suppose it takes all sorts but I do feel that his kind of show, although deliberately aimed at the non-expert, would offer no inspiration to take up model railways as a hobby, compared with say Tim Venton’s acutely observed signalling, operation and Somerset in miniature on Clutton.
The seagull sounds were downloaded from http://www.stockmusic.com. It was a brilliant service and only £6.25 for two downloads, paid via PayPal. Instant response to an email query, too, about difficulty of downloading using Safari on a MacBook. Took advice to switch to Firefox and hey presto! – it worked like a dream. My other contribution was to paint a rather dramatic backdrop which Ian declared unfit for purpose. So I covered it with white emulsion and he was thrilled. There’s no accounting for taste when you’re dealing with a model railway enthusiast.
We’ve subsequently discovered the British Library service of sound clips, which is free at http://sounds.bl.uk/Default.aspx